I thought I would post a hypothetical scenario to see what views are out there on the broad assumption that most members agree that site rules are necessary and that without them any member type site would be anarchic.
Scenario:
Member1: Miss A, self-acclaimed and award-winning adult pornstar, based abroad. Her published work, readily available and under the same name (Miss A) includes, but is not restricted to, hard BG and GG with 1 or more other models/actors.
Member2: Mr B, a pensioner with some experience, self proclaimed amateur photographer.
No further information is available.
Shoot takes place, arranged through MCM, and subsequently both leave positive feedback and 3 or 4 images, all of which comply with site rules, are uploaded to Mr B's portfolio in order to demonstrate his ability and experience.
Is it presumed that;
A) Miss A is a "wrong-un"
B) Mr B is a "wrong-in"
C) They are both "wrong-uns"
D) Neither is, as no rules were broken.
Is there an additional presumption, given the description of Miss A and Mr B, that more than just photography occurred at the shoot?
Am just interested to see if the hypothetical scenario polarises opinions or not.