Arkady001
4 likes
• 2016-07-23T19:01:00+00:00 •
A certain model is currently kicking off on FB because a photographer decided to clone out her pubic hair... Apparently its 'creepy and gross' to think of him zooming in on her foo-foo to remove the hair (she has a very closely-trimmed bush, not unkempt in the slightest).
I routinely have to zoom in on various parts of the image to remove stubble and yes, it's gross to have a foo or armpit at 200% magnification on my 26" monitor...
Lots of models and White Knights offering support... Etc.
My view is that if it's a paid shoot, the photographer can do whatever he likes with the images: turn her green, clone Donald Trump's face on her... Anything. His images. His choice. The end.
Unless... She mentions it in her pre-shoot comms or on her profile. In which case he can decide if he still wants to book her or not.
I routinely have to zoom in on various parts of the image to remove stubble and yes, it's gross to have a foo or armpit at 200% magnification on my 26" monitor...
Lots of models and White Knights offering support... Etc.
My view is that if it's a paid shoot, the photographer can do whatever he likes with the images: turn her green, clone Donald Trump's face on her... Anything. His images. His choice. The end.
Unless... She mentions it in her pre-shoot comms or on her profile. In which case he can decide if he still wants to book her or not.
Opinions expressed within this thread are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of ModelFolio, nor its associates.
ModelFolio accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for the content or accuracy of authors comments.
ModelFolio accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for the content or accuracy of authors comments.
