A case for more scrutiny?



Viewed 515 times
Started 2017-01-02T07:34:00+00:00
9 following this thread
Back to Member Chat

profilepictures
4 likes 2017-01-02T07:34:00+00:00
 profile photo

I'm not a regular contributor these days, but often have a quick browse to see if anything interesting is going on. This morning I''ve found the tagging system seems to have improved in function, but has some terms I find inappropriate allowed - specifically 'blow job' noted on a picture I'd reported for its caption 'any hole is a goal'. The contributor had thrown in 'facial' and MILF for good measure to ensure a thoroughly unpleasant montage.

I'd have hoped the team engaged in moderating would pick this sort of crap up pretty soon, and that the software associated with tagging would disallow a series of pornographic terms which could obviously be identified?

Certainly I'm not suggesting anything puritanical here, I'm a fan or artistic nudity, even the erotic in good photography - but that really isn't what's in question in these examples is it?






Opinions expressed within this thread are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of ModelFolio, nor its associates.
ModelFolio accepts no responsibility legal or otherwise for the content or accuracy of authors comments.

Join ModelFolio for Free! Log in